FCC ,Declaration of Eminent Domain?

If the Internet has been declared a public utility , will eminent domain be declared and the Inventor be compensated for the illegal confiscation of her intellectual property

,

Not likely as the true Internet 2 Inventor’s rights are still being ignored

Hartman alleges that her method was used by the Federal Government in 1990- 1991 to Commercialize or upgrade the previous structure to produce the “Information Superhighway” or what we know today as only one name , the INTERNET. Although her ideas were used to revolutionize the way the world does business and are responsible for what has become a highly successful telecom industry that rivals no other – Ms. Hartman has never been recognized or compensated for the major role she has played in the success of ecommerce and telecommunications . To the contrary thus far her right to Due Process regarding the use of her intellectual property without recognition or compensation is being violated .

After confiscating her intellectual property 25 years ago and refusing to even acknowledge her , the government used her ideas to invent a better internet .Building a better internet is just like building a better mousetrap or any other kind of invention . Does the government have the right to transfer credit of the invention to others and grant the opportunity to prosper to others without compensating her for the loss of her property ? These are constitutional questions . For the 8 years that the United States Patent and Trademark Office held the patent application of the Inventor – it tried 7 times to change its own patenting laws and the U.S. Congress tried at least 3 times to change laws such as to deny this patent . Finally changing the law from First to Invent to First To File which did not bar Hartman’s patent rights as she satisfied both criteria . The Patent Office became more creative in using manipulation to break patent laws by using malfeasance and fraud alleges the Inventor .

The reason of “Indefiniteness” used as a red herring to detract from the truth that the Internet is just to great . The Inventor states that this is no excuse to disrespect her rights . She is not responsible for the fact that the world’s most powerful government has steamrolled over the rights of a disabled minority for 25 years while the Internet grew to enormous proportions . She had asked for $35,000 twenty-five years ago to jump start her own telecommunications company .

” I have had other inventions go down the “rabbit hole” in the Patent Office and end up going from me to massive corporations , alleges Inventor . I did what I was supposed to do and that is take steps to protect my intellectual property . It is the government taking the property without compensating me . Fraud , among other things is the new Jim Crow . Had I been another color or ethnicity , there is no way this blasphemy would be occurring . The fight for justice will go on . ”

The Supreme Court recently upheld on February 23 , 2015 the Federal Appeals Court May 2013 decision which appears here .13-1070.opinion.3-6-2013.1

“Claims a novel business method whereby the computer with its communicable devices is the focal point of the business and transactions occur online or in cyberspace. Herein cyberspace is referred to as that virtual space within which transactions and exchanges occur and that exists between the interconnections of the communicable devices with remote websites . Cyberspace is infinite and thus an infinite number of transactions is possible. A website (W) is herein referred to as pages that are received from the host or recipient computer and that display the monitor of the user’s computer once the connection is established . See Figs[.] 1-6 .”
Drawings_doc.

Another criticism is that there is no distinction between where the inventor’s invention begins and the “other” ends . This is simply not true as the Internet based on the Arpanet and other “nets” before 1990 is distinctly different from today’s Internet . Generally when an invention is tied to the use of machinery as this invention is as hardware , software , and an Internet Service Provider is necessary to use the invention – this precludes “indefiniteness” in patent language. The fact that Cyberspace is potentially infinite does not mean that the Internet is infinite or an indefinite invention . It is defined – if not confined . It is limited by the availability of the hardware and accessories in order to operate . This argument by the Patent Office does not make sense , argues Hartman . Further hers is a domestic patent application not an international one . The government has already given away this intellectual property which originated in this country to others so that a relatively few who had already become rich could become richer. Giving away for free what could have been sold would have placed the country on par with energy producing nations and may have circumvented the trade imbalances and other problems now plaguing the economy. Having access to Information and access to consumers would almost have been as precious as energy .

Hartman alleges that this intellectual property was misappropriated from the start with racism , greed, and oppression playing lead roles from the start . The Internet now having morphed into the World Wide Web is now separated by geographical and political boundaries with other countries now having their own , period . She also alleges that she was put through undue pressures and that her original claims and disclosure were altered without her permission . In 8 years within the Patent Office , she was not given the opportunity to properly amend or edit her claims .Additionally evidence that she was the true and valid inventor in the form of original documents signed by government employees was simply ignored Learn more at her Blog at http://www.TelecomStraightTalk.com and http://www.abfyjewelers.net . Further legal action has not been ruled out as this is major injustice which should have been corrected by the Commerce Department which is the parent of these government programs long ago .

Selma Alabama History 50 years Beyond

The Civil Rights Laws are on the books , they just are not being enforced as Selma Alabama history is recreated

As the 50th Year Anniversary of the March on Selma , Alabama history is being remembered with some dignitaries recreating Dr.Martin Luther King and his brave followers march on “Bloody Sunday” – progress has not been fast enough . The Internet 2 inventor suffers terrible injustice and because of her race is expected to be satisfied with intellectual rape and the awarding of credit for her invention which is considered by most to be the greatest invention of the 20th Century to those considered ‘exceptional’ and ‘superior’ because of their race , ethnic group or class status .

There are laws in the country that protect the rights of minorities but they are not being enforced – instead injustice and ad hoc rationales and excuses instead of justice inside of a courtroom are being practiced as another shooting of a black man occurs in Madison , Wisconsin apparently with impunity . The facts are not yet known but there appears to be an epidemic of injustice to blacks with no real accountability . Even as the symbolic march in Selma is being held in 2015 over the same bridge where many suffered injury on Bloody Sunday to have the right to vote , the Voting Rights act of 1965 is under siege after recent actions by the Supreme Court to undo some of the provisions of the 1965 Act enabling some states to disenfranchise Black voters from their rolls.

There are many to thank for the progress that has been made in the African- American transition from Slavery in the 18th century to 2nd and 3rd class citizenship in the 21st Century . Although there has been a great deal of advancement – things have not advanced enough. Yet too much oppression and discrimination still remain in the form of institutionalized racism. From the Selma Alabama History of the 1960’s to the Ferguson , Missouri of 2015 there are still miles to travel in making justice for black people an equal opportunity affair . Blacks are still too much cast in demeaning roles and stereotypes – their achievements and humanity deferred to others . African- American inventors although some are now being listed in history books but for the most part were not credited or compensated for their inventions .We Did it , they hid it

Although America has not yet reached the point where Dr. Martin Luther King’s dream has become a reality and Blacks are still for the most part not judged as much for the ‘content of their character’ as for the ‘color of their skin ‘ there has been considerable progress . That progress has been contributed to and participated in by many . Malcolm X who spoke ‘by any means necessary’ died for the struggle. Not only did courageous Blacks ordinary people including sanitation workers with Dr.King in Memphis sacrifice themselves to maltreatment and being jailed – but others from different walks of life involved themselves in the struggle for liberty . Andrew Goodman and Micky Schwerner who were of Jewish descent died right along with James Chaney another freedom fighter , but African American in Mississippi during the CORE Freedom Summer Project in 1964 .

William Lloyd Garrison a white printer through his newspaper the Liberator began the Abolitionist Movement against slavery . Frederick Douglas later joined this group. John Brown who led an armed rebellion against slavery was also a white man . The Founding Fathers of the U.S. Constitution were white men who saw fit to view enslaved blacks as human beings added the 13th Amendment to the Constitution and ratified it – later adding the 14th Amendment .

It was Robert Kennedy who sent the Feds into Alabama in reference to the terrible and inhumane treatment of the Blacks marching and protesting in the South . The move towards civil rights legislation was initiated with the Kennedys and later the voting act and other landmark legislation was signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson following the assassination of Pres. John Kennedy .

Not to mention the lives lost during the Civil War – the Country has overcome and been though so much conflict in reference to RACE in this country . Yet in spite of the progress , there are those who would take the country back to the 18th century if they could . People of all classes , races , and walks of life have participated in the march and struggle for racial equality within this country .

Nowhere is that more obvious than in the recent protests from the past six months of people -so many of them millenials protesting the slayings of Michael Brown of Ferguson and Eric Garner of New York City in the “Black Lives Matter” and ” I can’t Breathe” protests . African Americans must be careful not to segregate themselves . There was so much jealousy and mayhem indoctrinated into the African psyche by slave masters separating ‘field workers’ and ‘house workers’ . Also separating them by skin hues and assigning castes as often the ‘light skins’ were of the house and presumed as better ( more often than not as a result of siring by the master ) were separate from the ‘dark skins’ . This divide and conquer strategy is still being used , but African Americans must not fall victim to it . They are not a monolithic people as they are as different as any other race in terms of personalities , experiences , skills and talents . Even their looks vary from blue-eyed and fair to very dark skin . There is however the shared and common experience(s) of institutionalized racism, prejudice and oppression .

The inventor who alleges that she invented the Internet 2 did not achieve all by herself . Most she attributes to the Almighty working through supportive people , hard work and scholarship leading to a good education. “Although I am grateful for the contributions of our Black leaders like the marchers to Selma Alabama history – we must not just rely on marches and fiery speeches . We must be ever vigilant and look to the government to uphold and reinforce laws that protect minority rights ” , says the Inventor . She spent most of her employment career teaching Science . She tries to give back through her skills and to lead by example .

What is FREE OPEN Internet ?

When was there a free and open Internet ?

If you think that the recent FCC vote will make the Internet more free and open – perhaps you may be interested in purchasing Time Share on the planet Pluto ( which by the way is no longer even considered a planet in this solar system ) . See the following excerpt from the Inventor’s remarks to the FCC Commission in 2008 regarding a free and open internet :

…. Ms . Hartman alleges that the federal government has made a monumental decisions to remove any rights that she might have to claiming the INTERNET as her intellectual property by the “rush” to declare the spectrum open for licenses , auctions , “giveaways”, etc. The United States Patent and Trademark Office under the Department of Commerce has delayed the processing of Ms. Hartman’s patent application for almost four (4) years essentially holding the patent application “hostage”while the government through the FCC has made its moves to strip Ms. Hartman of any proprietary or ownership rights by seeking even now to give away ‘ free access to all Americans ‘ and is apparently going around the world to give ‘free access to everyone .’ While on the face of it -it may seem “free access” – upon closer inspection it really is not ,as the tech companies which received government funding to build it in the first place will still be allowed to prosper for they will continue to charge fees for their services and costs for technology gadgets that customers will need to access the so called “free” internet ……

The difference is that the INTERNET is bundled in and therefore any ownership or property rights by the inventor are made null and void. As altruistic as the acts appear to be on the face of it “broadband to all Americans “ or ‘free access to everyone ‘ – indeed it may simply be a ruse to cover a very unjust act– of racism and oppression . All indication is that the service is not free per se but bundled in with fee packages from various telecom and other tech companies and now even car companies and hotel packages- some of
this bundling already begun and on the market using “free internet” as a ‘hook’ or ‘draw.’

The only thing supposedly non fee is the internet which is bundled in and Ms. Hartman contends that this arrangement is designed to strip her of any residual rights that she might have even if awarded a patent and of any proprietary rights , such as ownership and
management of the property .Therefore , -not only for her protection as an inventor , but for the protection of other inventors and for the prevention of ad hoc laws and rules made on the basis of prejudice , suspicion , and fear and not jurisprudence and sound judgment- she hopes that the FCC will be very thorough in the evaluation of its acts and the facts .Being thus , perhaps it will not seek to hurt rules governing proprietary information , patent laws and intellectual property laws . This would be acting arbitrarily , capriciously , and not in accordance with law.

You may view the entire document for Hartman’s Comments before the FCC in 2008 here :

FCC Opposition to Petitions by Hartman

‘If it ain’t broke , don’t fix it’ . Meddling , racial injustice and oppression are not the answer when it comes to a free open internet. For free open internet , what is wrong with the one we have ? What is needed is justice and Commissions to study and adopt rules and regulations to address those who do abuse the system .

There Was No Internet 2 in 1990

Internet 2 did not exist . For all of those now trying to “hog” the Internet , there was no Internet in 1990 . What was left of the Arpanet and the prior “Internetting Projects” [ see image to the left ] had been retired and were parked in a structure called the NSFnet under the auspices of the National Science Foundation.

Internet 2 debuted after 1990 . The above diagram shows the Internet in 1987 , its structure based on the Arpanet . Internet 1 was permanently retired by 1989 and parked in a structure called the NSFnet . This black female internet inventor presented to the federal government through its Small Business Innovation Programs , SBIR ideas entitled The Feasibility of Accessing Accessibility. The inventor disclosed in these proposals ideas how to improve telecommunications by commercializing it – making it available to businesses and consumers . Although Dorothy M. Hartman asked the government for only $25,000 to $35,000 to launch her own prototype telecommunications services company – she was denied funding and support . Her ideas were stolen by the National Science Foundation and used to revive and transform the telecom networks . This inventor was the single most responsible person for difference between no internet and the presence of a successful internet of today . Yet she has not been credited nor compensated.

The government has ignored and denied the inventor’s rights for the past 25 years while today’s Internet ( called Internet 2 as it is a distinguished structure from that of the previous Internet before 1990 ) has flourished and reaches practically every corner of the earth circulating trillions of dollars through the economy . In addition to the losses regarding the Internet , Inventor suffers other losses . Read more here about Other Inventions

Technology has been glorified and Ecommerce have been glorified because these fields have become exceedingly rich due to the ideas presented by Hartman to use computers and cyberspace as an alternate marketplace. Her ideas are the reasons why Internet 2 or the modern day Internet which grew out of the Commercializationof the Nsfnet can accommodate billions of people online . This expansion was impossible under the previous Internet(1) structure which was based on the Arpanet . Everyone from those who created email and website protocol , internet service providers , search engines , computer and phone manufacturers , and code writers have been given credit as being the inventors and founders of the Internet because they have made billions of dollars from sheer number of users being online . Because of the gross violations of her intellectual property rights alleges Hartman these corporations now huge because of her invention have been given the credit and the opportunity to prosper.Everyone but Ms. Hartman who is the true inventor of the Internet. Yet is treated as a pariah for standing up for her own right .

Hundreds perhaps thousands of various types of technicians are involved in maintaining the Internet and making it work . The government funds it – but its creation is by this inventor who is being deliberately ignored by the government . The government is breaking its own laws in violating the civil and constitutional rights of this inventor and “practicing fraud” , she remarks .

NSF Commercializes Telecom in 1990-1991
NSF Commercializes Telecom in 1990-1991
Internet becomes a conduit for Business and Education in 1990's
Internet becomes a conduit for Business and Education in 1990’s

The Internet begins to grow after the transformation in 1990
The Internet begins to grow after the transformation in 1990

The United States Patent and Trademark Office through fraud and deliberate discrimination of the inventor who is a minority and classified under several protected groups is violating her rights to a patent . Further the FCC under its powers is imposing government rules and regulations – steamrolling over the rights of this inventor . The Internet which over the past 25 years , we have all come to take for granted does truly have an inventor . One whose rights have been egregiously violated by corporations that have become rich because of the Internet and a government that has become very powerful because of same .FCC Opposition to Petitions by Hartman

Yet there has been shown no shred of lawfulness or decency by the federal government when it comes to the intellectual property rights of this woman . The inventor alleges that not only has her patent rights been abused by the Patent Office in reference to the Internet but that she has had other inventions find their way into the hands of rich corporations .

Will FCC Vote Smash Inventor’s Rights…

How will FCC Vote matter ? The world may have changed since the invention of the Internet , but the Internet has not. The Internet continues to do exactly what it was programmed to do in the invention – the Accessing Accessibility Process- and that is to expand .Computer makers , phone makers , and code writers did not invent the Internet – this inventor did- see Inventor’s 2008 comments to the FCC.Using telecommunications to lift the economy out of recession , access to ordinary consumers and businesses were the ideas of this inventor – not the FCC or the Federal Government .

Excerpts from Hartman 1990.thru.1991.Proposals

Be careful what you wish for you might get it . The Internet was made for consumers . Complete control of the government of the Internet as a Public Utility will produce more taxes , more fees , and worst of all more lack of privacy and loss of freedoms . It will be even Bigger Government on Steroids !

See Inventor’s Patent Application below . Also masked under this Trojan Horse is the complete destruction of the Internet Inventor’s rights just as the U.S. Supreme Court is supposed to rule on an Appeal by the inventor that was filed by the Inventor on December 30 , 2014 . The Court to review it in Conference on February 20 , 2015 . The Inventor who is an African- American female says that she has found this administration to be oppressive and weak when it comes to improving the status for Blacks in the country . Except for politics and photo-ops , there has been very little in the way of policy changing legislation or any other movement towards improving the continuing status of Blacks as second and third class citizens subjected to institutionalized injustice .

Accessing Accessibility Process Patent Application

One of the FCC Commissioners , Ajit Pai appeared on Larry King’s POLITICKING show . One of the topics covered is the upcoming FCC vote . In his interview he showed a 300+ page document that has not been shared with the public but will be voted upon by the FCC Commission within the coming days . Ajit Pai indicated that the vote will probably be a 3-2 Decision to approve .

FCC Opposition to Petitions by Hartman
Should the Public push to know exactly what it is that will be voted upon and approved by the FCC Commission ? The FCC Commission consists of 5 members . Why are the particulars of the FCC vote not being made known to the public . What is known about exactly what they will be voting on ? Net Neutrality may be a myth . What more invasions of privacy or restrictions of U.S. freedoms that populace may be subjected to ? Perhaps what is needed are regulations to improve the status of the Internet as it already is . The Internet appears to be working okay as is . A FCC vote to change that will be more problematic as presented thus far . For those of you with short memories , remember Sispa and Sopa and what constitutes internet freedom . The problem is not he Internet but those who use it . The problem is those who use it to accomplish negative results that upset the balance of things . Or when the legislation surrounding it is used to oppress or suppress constitutional rights and freedoms .

FCC Vote to Big Government ?

FCC Vote could lead to bigger government

Alleged Inventor of Internet 2 says , ” I do not wish to rule over the Internet- I am only a human being “.

I do wish to be credited for my invention which is considered by some to be the greatest invention of the 20th Century

My rights should not be steamrolled over by the FCC Commission or the Federal Government because of my skin color, says ABFY CEO

It was the Accessing Accessibility method proposed by the Inventor that made telecommunications accessible to businesses and ordinary consumers and created the Internet 2 or the modern day Internet . Read more at her blog http://www.TelecomStraightTalk.com

Excerpts from Hartman 1990.thru.1991.Proposals

Hartman 2008 Comments before FCC. 1st 5 pages

Be careful what you wish for . The Internet under full control of the government would be like Big Government on Steroids !!!! Is that really the answer ? Or some type of compromise position ? The CEO of ABFYSELLERS GROUP alleges that she is the Inventor of Internet 2 is skeptical of the impending FCC Decision to be made by the FCC vote by the Commission and announced by FCC Chairman Wheeler in a few days . One of the FCC Commissioners , Ajit Pai appeared on Larry King’s POLITICKING show . One of the topics covered is the upcoming FCC vote . In his interview he showed a 300+ page document that has not been shared with the public but will be voted upon by the FCC Commission within the coming days . Ajit Pai indicated that the vote will probably be a 3-2 Decision to approve .

Should the Public push to know exactly what it is that will be voted upon and approved by the FCC Commission ? The FCC Commission consists of 5 members . Why are the particulars of the FCC vote not being made known to the public . What is known about exactly what they will be voting on ? Net Neutrality may be a myth . What more invasions of privacy or restrictions of U.S. freedoms that populace may be subjected to ? Perhaps what is needed are regulations to improve the status of the Internet as it already is . The Internet appears to be working okay as is . The problem is not he Internet but those who use it . The problem is those who use it to accomplish negative results that upset the balance of things . Or when the legislation surrounding it is used to oppress or suppress constitutional rights and freedoms .

There is no particular expertise being expressed here – just observation and opinions based on observation . Net Neutrality is a good concept to keep the Internet accessible to businesses and consumers alike . Net Neutrality already exists to a large extent . The problems are by those that try to upset the apple cart by negative activity that either intrudes or extrudes excessively . Perhaps what is needed is a larger FCC Commission or more Commissions to ponder such huge problems . Problems that involve keeping the Internet open , but competitive and innovative at the same time . What is the status of the Internet when the rights of an inventor are involved ? The present status of the Internet has never been fully known or understood . Perhaps that is a good place to start .

FCC , Net Neutrality , Internet 2 Inventor

12-17-2014 12;00;16PMPresident Obama has stated that converting the Internet into a Public Utility would be an answer to Net Neutrality and keeping an open and free Internet . Some are endorsing this plan which is not popular with cable companies . The following excerpt is taken from THE FREEMAN article written OCTOBER 03, 2012 by STEVE FRITZINGER and mentions some of the history of the Internet :

In his now-famous “You didn’t build that” speech, President Obama said, “The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”…… Obama’s claim is in line with the standard history of the Internet. That story goes something like this: In the 1960s the Department of Defense was worried about being able to communicate after a nuclear attack. So it directed the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) to design a network that would operate even if part of it was destroyed by an atomic blast. ARPA’s research led to the creation of the ARPANET in 1969. ………………………For civilian agencies and universities, NSFNET, operated by the National Science Foundation, replaced ARPANET in 1985. ARPANET was finally shut down in February 1990. NSFNET continued to operate until 1995, during which time it grew into an important backbone for the emerging Internet ….

The CEO of ABFY SELLERS GROUP who alleges that she is the true inventor of today’s Internet emphatically states that true Internet history is not known and that the FCC and President Obama are leaving her out . What is Internet Neutrality ? The Inventor’s contributions to the development of the Internet 2 are still being suppressed by the federal government which has awarded itself complete control of the Internet since its inception by ARPA in 1969 . However the Internet now visible and in use by billions did not become publicly known until around 1995 after the previous telecom network initially instituted by ARPA had phased out and a new structure was in place . That structure is commonly referred to as Internet 2 as the telecom structure based on the Arpanet model is referred to as Internet 1 .

Internet 2 exists because of the innovative concepts of an Inventor whose name has not been made a part of Internet history because she alleges that the government stole her ideas to successfully transform telecom structure into what we now refer to as the “Internet”. She alleges that credit was given to the National Science Foundation and to those already in the tech community which was commissioned by the NSF to implement the changes . Internet neutrality was built into the structure from the beginning as the Inventor presented proposals that for the first time gave ordinary consumers access to the Internet . This is the Internet 2 of today which serves billions of people . Internet 2 is drastically different from Internet 1 which was based on the Arpanet and phased out in 1990 . Her ideas were meant to help others as well as herself but she has not benefited it in the least . “That is what happens when you are black and have invented one of the world’s greatest inventions .” She continues to fight in Court because this is a huge injustice .

She alleges that it is the powerful and the greedy who have completely taken over completely because the invention turned out to be what she had predicted to the government and then some . Unfortunately power has steered the control to the oligarchs who now are trying to squeeze the small users out – just as she has been squeezed out of the entire process . Go to Public Pair on the USPTO.gov website and enter the application number .The modern day Internet is her invention . You can acquaint yourself with Hartman’s Patent Application , Number 11003123 here

<http://www.uspto.gov/

CEO and Inventor Dorothy M. Hartman conceived the ideas of using cyberspace which is latent in computers as an alternate marketplace shared among computer user networks and predicted that this application would revolutionize commerce and the industry. It has making the technology and ecommerce community millionaires and billionaires , but the inventor of the process goes without credit or compensation . The networks described in the FREEMAN article ended with the ARPANET which shut down by 1990 and was parked in a holding structure called the NSFNET . The prior networks had become defunct and were not profitable . The Inventor’s proposals submitted to the federal government in March 1990 demonstrated ways in which the telecom network(s) could be transformed making it both profitable and self-sustaining . She alleges that her ideas were used by the NSF to create Internet 2 . She is owed credit and compensation .

Net Neutrality can hardly be considered without knowing the status of the rights of the inventor . If the government assigns the entity for the public good as a utility – then according to the Constitution – Eminent Domain should be declared and the owner appropriately compensated . ” This is precisely why the Patent Office has been allowed thus far to violate my constitutional rights.” says the inventor . However it is not my fault that the government has not compensated me for 25 years while the Internet has expanded . That is exactly what it was designed to do with the ideas of my proposals reduced to practice . Now that it is an overwhelming success , I am supposed to suffer for that . This is the ugliness of institutionalized racism .”

Her contributions are of monumental importance because they made the difference between an Internet(1) that had essentially ended and the vibrant and expansive Internet(2) that exists today . More than any other person in the history today her intellectual property was the most crucial – because it made the difference between having an Internet and not having one . No one else has come forth to make that claim or to dispute it . Yet the Inventor’s rights have not been considered in any government decision be it by President Obama or Chairman Wheeler of the FCC when considering Net Neutrality .

These method, the Accessing Accessibility Process and the benefits as described by Hartman that would be derived from its application were used by the National Science Foundation which had the remnants of the Arpanet parked in its charge under the NSFNET. The National Science Foundation applied Hartman’s template to restructuring the NSFNET – producing what was first nicknamed by Vice President Al Gore as the “Information Superhighway”. The Information Superhighway morphed into today’s Internet which has expanded all over the world – creating the WorldWide Web which continues to evolve . It was the vision of this Inventor which created the Internet and the government is aware of her contributions but thus far has not acknowledged or credited her . She has placed her case , docketed IN RE DOROTHY M. HARTMAN before the United States Supreme Court An appeal was filed on December 30 , 2014 to be reviewed in Court Conference on February 20 , 2015 .

There are contributors to the Internet whose names have been included in the history of the Internet and the WorldWide Web. Presently their names and comments have been spread profusely over Google and the Internet speaking out on Net Neutrality now that Chairman Wheeler of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is supposed to make a decision in the coming weeks regarding Net Neutrality . That decision may decide whether or not the Internet might be reclassified as a Public Utility in answer to the question regarding a free and open Internet . Many seem to be in favor, while cable companies are not . However no comments have been made by President Obama or FCC Chairman Wheeler about what rights an inventor may have since thus far – she has been completely ignored .

Beware Bad Webhosts ; SEO Plugins !

If your website is missing , could bad web hosts or bad seo plugins be the answer…

Shop carefully for hosting and web development…

You are wondering why in spite of your effort to improve the ranking of your website – you are not making progress !!!! You have spent time , money , and effort . Is it a matter of effort or dollars ? Maybe its both or neither .

https://LINK HERE FOR TELECOM STRAIGHT TALK AND WRIT FOR CERTIORARI DENIED 2013

There is another Troll on the Internet – truly bad Web Hosts and SEO Plugins that are really not so ‘search engine friendly’ might be holding you back . Cable companies or ISP’s are sometimes given a bad rep because they are charged with providing service , but they are not always the bad guys . Underneath the service are the hosting companies and web developers .

Be careful of what you get . They are not all ethical . Some of them step outside of their professional niche which is always a mistake – putting themselves before their customers to make political statements. They may be touted by gurus as the ‘best plugins’ in the world but if they are loaded with bad code , your website will tank right to the bottom . So if your website is down when it should be up – make sure that you check all the parameters .

The FTC ( Federal Trade Commission ) is supposed to have jurisdiction over that , but has not been stringent enough in its enforcement of the law to prevent censuring and blocking . It should do more to monitor complaints and reign in renegade as well as truly bad companies .

This country was founded on debate . Transparency of content and open dialogue with different points of view expressed is what fosters a free and open Internet – fostering competition and innovation not stifling it with legalized ‘hacking’. Hiring companies less well known , but more ethical may be a solution .

Commercializing Telecommunications

When will institutionalized racism and oppression stop rearing their ugly heads ?

It’s not just a problem in Ferguson, racism is a problem everywhere and in all walks of life.

See Inventor’s Patent Application here :
No.11/003,123

The history of telecom and information technology history , what do we really know ?. Dorothy M. Hartman , Inventor of Internet 2 says “not nearly enough “. The federal government has known of her contributions to the development of todays’s Internet for 25 years and is still suppressing the truth about the invention of the Internet and refusing to grant her JUSTICE . See here her patent application for the process which she alleges led to the Internet .

Since the Internet has become of such extreme importance , producing such power and wealth the government has assumed ownership by default . Supposedly the FCC has power to distribute huge blocks of Internet real estate with no mention of the Inventor at all . It’s interesting that now that the Internet has become all that Hartman predicted that it would be in her writings to the federal government between 1990 and 1992 of how commercializing preexisting technologies could improve telecommunications and upgrade the economy – it seems not to even know her name .

Enclosed is a PDF of the Inventor’s Patent Application #11/003,123 for the Accessing Accessibility Process which is published on the USPTO.gov website . This process alleges Hartman which when it was reduced to practice by the National Science Foundation is what invented Internet 2 or today’s modern Internet . She submitted proposals beginning in 1990 and over the next two years . These proposals written to the government between 1990 and 1992 were reviewed by numerous government employees and correspondence back and forth between them – some reporting directly to the National Science Foundation for the awarding of funding for the Small Business Innovation Research Programs .

Yet the government today acts as though it does not even know her name . One copy of a denial letter – although she received several from government employee(s) to Hartman is enclosed here Government Employee Denial Letter to Hartman 08.1991. historically , it was Hartman who first suggested commercializing telecommunications by (a) placing a variety of transactions online like information retrieval , ordering goods , and delivery of services ; (b) using the virtual environment of cyberspace which is latent in all computers as a virtual market or warehouse in space (c) setting up networks comprised of units consisting of a computer user logged in interfacing with one or several websites or with each other- some drawings shown with her patent application 11/003,123 are shown . The entire network or data carried by an internet service provider such as a dedicated modem or phone line . However refined drawings are not shown because they along with properly amended claims were never allowed by the patent office after 2008 . Although it held the application for 8 years which is discriminatory in itself and did not deny the patent until September 2012 – the Office was in constant and chronic violations of her civil and constitutional rights including patent laws alleges Hartman .

These are the concepts on which the modern day Internet which reaches practically every corner of the globe are built . Not that there were not databases in 1990 when Hartman presented her ideas , but they were very limited – Commerce although found to a small degree in Prodigy , Compuserve , MCImail , and Dow Jones News Retrieval was actually not allowed on the majority of the network(s). The original networks were used mostly by the elite and only slightly under 2% of the population owned computers .

It was Hartman’s ideas to open the field to the average consumer and place businesses and consumers in closer contact – a process she referred to as Accessing Accessibility . It made things more accessible to both consumers and businesses and implementing the ideas produced a successful “Information Superhighway” which morphed into the Internet .

Hartman who had asked for a mere pittance of money between $25,000 and $35,000 was shown nothing but grief and the door . Not even today after 25 years of success of what some view as the greatest invention of the 20th Century has she been compensated a dime or received one word of honorable mention . Those who had been associated with the telecom history from its inception were given the credit , funding , and the opportunity to prosper .

Hartman has received DENIALS then and is still being denied JUSTICE in the Courts . Although it is clear from historical timelines that the Internet as we know it today where billions of people are now online never existed before its debut around 1993-1995 and only after the transformation caused by commercialization and changing the structure . Will Racism and Oppression which is taking the Country backwards and away from its number 1 position in the world ever stop rearing its ugly head ? The Inventor’s whose ideas are good enough to be stolen , but she is apparently not good enough to be paid wants and deserves JUSTICE !

Government Knew About Invention

The government has known for 25 years Hartman’s contributions to the development of the Internet

Injustice is suffered by Blacks in Ferguson , New York City, all around the country, and in different walks of life

The rights of a Black Inventor whose invention is one of the greatest in history are still being violated

Even as protest marches have erupted in the country in defense of justice now for black men gunned down during encounters with the police – there is still large scale inequity and disregard for the written law being practiced in the justice system . Even as it is applied to patents , intellectual property , and contract law .

Dorothy M. Hartman who claims to be the creative mind behind a successful Internet that now reaches practically every part of the globe says that her rights are still being violated and her contributions suppressed . She is the inventor behind the Information Superhighway , and the changes that occurred during the dot.com boom and bust during the 1990’s . Here on her Blog and its sister blog at Telecom Straight Talk , you will find this woman’s story which represents the part of Internet History which you have not been told . All of the credit given over to the fields of Technology and Ecommerce , but yet neither field would be the size it is today had it not been for this woman’s intellectual contributions .

The image above shows the publication of the abstract for the USPTO patent application Accessing Accessibility Process which alleges Hartman led to Commercialization of the industry which changed the Internet from the prior one to the one of today which is based on her simplified structure of a network of computers ( or other communicative devices ) communicating with each other and exchanging transactions . The data packets provided by internet service providers . Access full image of Patent Application Abstract here :Abstact Patent Application for Internet

The model of the Internet of today is closer to that shown in her figures where the sizes of the networks increase simply by plugging in more users or computers into the network and cyberspace which is infinite is able to accomodate the new users . This is why the Internet has become great but the true inventor is being illegally discriminated against and prevented from the opportunity to prosper – her intellectual property accredited to others .
Fig6

Internet-1987

The Patent Application which was illegally held for 8 years alleges Hartman and was manipulated by what she alleges to be fraud and malfeasance was denied in July of 2012 by the Patent Office . She alleges that the reasons for the Denial are not legally valid . Thus far the high courts have refused to examine what went on in the United States Patent and Trademark Office .

The inventor alleges that the administration did nothing over the years of the Application being illegally withheld or to stop the blatant mishandling – but instead tried in every way it possibly could including revisions of the Manual for Patent Examination Procedures and revising patent laws to deny what by a Prima Facie case should have been a Patent as the Internet is a unique invention that even though itself has given rise to many forms of innovation can never be repeated .

In 1990 , Hartman had asked only for $35,000 to fund her own small business Talk Shoppe Inc. a prototype telecommunications services company but was denied . She alleges that is was because of her gender , skin color , and handicap . She alleges her ideas were stolen to revamp the Internet in 1990-1991.

Government Employee Denial Letter to Hartman 08.1991

image

Although her ideas were used to build an Internet that now circulates trillions of dollars through it and empowers the government – she is still being denied and disrespected . Apparently she does not seem to able to afford justice as thus far the high court in the land has denied her petitions without comment. Why should she have to pay for Justice when it was her ideas that caused the economy to grow ? She is certainly not responsible for the runaway greed that is now causing the economy to implode . What ever happened to doing something because it is the right thing to do ? The federal government should have acknowledged her contributions years ago . Also read here Justice and Net Neutrality

For more information , bookmark the blog and stay involved in Justice Watch .